🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have harvested millions of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to release them online.

Potential Boost for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers noted the seeming data breach could boost artificial intelligence firms looking for material to train their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a third party collected public metadata and used questionable methods to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not think the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, said the breached music would likely be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is sadly widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to LibGen, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been leveraged by Meta to train its AI models.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “build their own personal free version of Spotify”. He said it could also allow tech companies to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between artists, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a ministerial proposal to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, innovation and development told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.